March 28, 2005
King County partners with Puget Sound Energy to take an 'all resource' approach to conservation
2005 Archived News
King County Executive Ron Sims today announced a conservation partnership
with Puget Sound Energy (PSE) that is expected to enhance the county's
energy and environmental stewardship and save the county up to $200,000
in the first year.
The agreement will make King County the largest organization taking
part in PSE's Resource Conservation Manager Service Program, which
takes an 'all resource' approach to conservation. The county's savings
would come from increasing efficiencies in electricity and natural
gas use, and reducing the amount of solid waste produced and water
consumed.
"King County is already highly committed to water and energy
conservation, and to recycling, and this partnership will only enhance
those efforts," said Sims. "Reducing our costs helps us
keep our rates low and reduces our dependence on general taxes."
PSE says most of the savings would come from changes in practices,
and do not require major investments in equipment. PSE estimates
the first year dollar savings for King County to be between $150,000
and $200,000. Sims said King County will begin the program in the
Department of Natural Resources and Parks and eventually expand
countywide.
"Through our ongoing collaborative efforts with King County
to save energy and reduce costs, this new conservation partnership
program will continue to extend the county's reach in reducing its
operating costs while conserving our natural resources," said
Cal Shirley, Director of Energy Efficiency Services at Puget Sound
Energy.
PSE will pay 25 percent of the first year's salary for a resource
conservation manager as a start-up incentive to assist with getting
the program up and running and provide a grant to buy resource tracking
software. PSE will work with the manager to reduce costs for electricity,
natural gas, water, sewer, garbage, and recycling. Savings are accomplished
systematically through careful attention to utility cost accounting,
benchmarking of facilities, and implementation of low cost operational
and behavioral changes. More conservation grants and/or rebates
may also be available for certain measures and equipment retrofits.
The value of the program comes from making many small changes with
little to no investment in equipment. According to PSE, these types
of operational changes often result in 10 percent to 15 percent
reductions within three years, and dollars saved from this program
often are redirected to other needs such as maintenance projects,
critical equipment repair or replacement, and efficiency incentives
programs.